Trump Impeachment Hearing: Three of four witnesses say Trump committed impeachable offenses

Scholar Turley says he does not see proof of 'quid pro quo' in House intelligence report

The House Judiciary Committee kicks off its first hearing of the impeachment inquiry at 10 a.m. Wednesday with an exploration of the constitutional grounds for impeachment, including what constitutes bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors and whether President Donald Trump's actions meet those definitions.

Today's hearing begins a critical phase of the inquiry as Democrats continue to try to convince Americans, who according to the latest opinion poll, remain bitterly divided over whether Trump should be impeached.
The witnesses will include Harvard law professor Noah Feldman; Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan; University of North Carolina law professor Michael Gerhardt; and George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley. The first three witnesses were asked to testify by the committee's Democrats, and Turley was called by the panel's Republican members.

Three of four witnesses say Trump committed impeachable offenses

Feldman says "Trump has committed high crimes and misdemeanors," expounds on why president's actions are impeachable.

Karlan says she is 'insulted' by ranking member Collins' 'suggestion I don't care about the facts,' compares Trump's Ukraine efforts to holding hurricane aid hostage.

Gerhardt: If you don't impeach Trump, impeachment has no meaning.

Turley says impeachment is wrong because it's being rushed, not because Trump is right, takes issue with bribery and obstruction allegations.

White House responds, saying Karlan's "commentary is clouded by anti-Trump bias" and focusing on what Feldman has said before about presidential misconduct.

There is no doubt that President Donald Trump's actions require him to be removed from office, three scholars of US constitutional law have testified.

The three experts described Mr Trump's efforts to solicit help from a foreign nation as a crime and accused him of obstructing justice.

Four experts, three picked by Democrats and one by the Republicans, have been testifying in Congress.

The fourth said Mr Trump's actions were wrong, but not impeachable.

As the investigation entered a new phase, the experts testified to the House Judiciary Committee which began hearings aimed at drawing up articles of impeachment.

Its hearings come hot on the heels of the House Intelligence Committee's investigation, which concluded on Tuesday with a 300-page report accusing Mr Trump of putting his own personal political interests "above the national interests of the United States" by soliciting foreign interference in the 2020 US elections.

The impeachment process began in September after an anonymous whistleblower complained to Congress about a July phone call by Mr Trump to the president of Ukraine, in which Mr Trump appeared to tie US military assistance to Ukraine launching investigations which would help him politically.

The White House has rejected the allegations made by Democrats, who hold the majority in the House of Representatives. Mr Trump questioned the patriotism of Democrats, asking: "Do they love our country?"

Among formal impeachment charges expected to be considered by the judiciary committee are abuse of power, obstruction of justice and contempt of Congress.

Democrats are keen to hold a vote on impeachment in the House of Representatives before the end of the year, with the prospect of a trial in the Senate perhaps as early as January 2020.

The legal experts interpreted the impeachment clause of the constitution, which allows for presidents to be removed from office due to "high crimes and misdemeanours".

Prof Feldman testified that the "evidence clearly constitutes" an impeachable offence because Mr Trump's interactions with Ukraine show him "corruptly using the powers of the presidency for personal political gain".

As she began her testimony, Prof Karlan scolded the committee's top Republican, saying she was "insulted" by his comment implying that she had not reviewed the intelligence committee's public testimony of 12 witnesses.

"I would like to say to you, sir, that I read transcripts of every one" of the witnesses, she said. "But everything I read on those occasions tells me that when President Trump invited, indeed demanded, foreign involvement in our upcoming election, he struck at the very heart what makes this a republic to which we pledge allegiance."

Mr Trump has attacked the "safeguards against establishing a monarchy in this country", Prof Gerhardt stated.

"The president's serious misconduct, including bribery, soliciting a personal favour from a foreign leader in exchange for his exercise of power, and obstructing justice and Congress are worse than the misconduct of any prior president, including what previous presidents who faced impeachment have done or been accused of doing," he said in his opening remarks.

"If what we're talking about here is not impeachable, nothing is impeachable," he added.

Prof Turley, who was chosen as a witness by Republicans, said he disagreed with Mr Trump's conduct but "this is not how an American president should be impeached". He also warned that Democrats are setting a dangerous precedent.

"I get it. You are mad. The President is mad. My Democratic friends are mad. My Republican friends are mad...." he said. "We are all mad and where has it taken us? Will a slipshod impeachment make us less mad or will it only give an invitation for the madness to follow in every future administration?"

Sources: CNBC / BBC

No comments

Poster Speaks

Poster Speaks/box